All posts by Jonathan A. Segal

Jonathan A. Segal

About Jonathan A. Segal

Jonathan’s preventive and corrective approach to employment/HR issues includes counseling, policies, training, agreements and audits. Areas of substantive focus include, for example: gender equality, wage and hour compliance, social media and employee engagement. When Jonathan isn’t counseling employers or dedicating his time to SHRM and the HR community, he can be found volunteering his time and efforts to animal rescue. Jonathan is also mad about Mad Men, writing and speaking on the employment issues arising out of the MadMen Era! Follow Jonathan on Twitter @Jonathan_HR_Law.

Y Tu Joan and Peggy

Well, last night, Don Draper finally returned to work. After getting an offer from a competitor, Don confronts Roger, who agrees to take him back.

However, Roger did not obtain prior approval from the other partners.  When they met, they agreed to Don’s return subject to restrictions, such as no drinking at work (makes sense) and no meeting with clients alone (less so). Continue reading Y Tu Joan and Peggy

“Extreme” French Proposed E-Mail Law: Already Law in U.S.

A bill is being considered in France that would potentially restrict severely use of e-mail by employees off the clock.

I have read many business leaders respond with dismay.  How much can French government regulate and expect business to survive, let alone thrive? Continue reading “Extreme” French Proposed E-Mail Law: Already Law in U.S.

Mad Men: Beginning of the End

Last night was, according to @DonDraper_NY, the “beginning of the end.” And, what a beginning it was.

Don remains on paid leave. He visits Megan in California and then returns home to NY.

In his absence from the workplace, much of the focus was on Peggy and Joan. Both worked incredibly hard on client retention and satisfaction but each was marginalized in ways that too many women still are today. Continue reading Mad Men: Beginning of the End

What the Supreme Court’s Decision on Donning and Doffing DOES NOT MEAN!

Case: Sandifer v. United States Steel Corporation

Background:  As a general rule, the FLSA requires employers to pay their employees for time spent changing into required protective clothing/gear at work. Continue reading What the Supreme Court’s Decision on Donning and Doffing DOES NOT MEAN!